![spyhunter malware remover vs malwarebytes spyhunter malware remover vs malwarebytes](https://www.correototal.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/1634443404_945_Spyhunter-5-≫-What-is-it-where-to-download-it.png)
As Malwarebytes points out, the Appeals Court found Kaspersky’s blocking of Zango’s adware to be immune from Zango’s claims of interference, reasoning that the removal of objectionable software is pretty much equivalent to removing objectionable content. In that case, Kaspersky availed itself of Section 230 immunity to dismiss claims made by Zango, an adware pusher.
![spyhunter malware remover vs malwarebytes spyhunter malware remover vs malwarebytes](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/reviews/07lsP6ZPMNhGp9TzpIBcGqi-7..v1569479240.jpg)
Malwarebytes cited a Ninth Circuit Appeals Court decision which dealt with the actions of another anti-malware provider, Kaspersky. Malwarebytes has emerged victorious in a lawsuit that began with unfair business practices allegations before somehow morphing into an argument about the limits of Section 230 immunity. The developers of this more highly-regarded anti-malware program soon found themselves facing the litigious wrath of Enigma, which apparently makes enough from its pay-to-clean, auto-renewing, subscription-based Spyhunter program to keeps lawyers busy all the damn time.Įnigma decided to sue Malwarebytes for felony interference with a business model, a.k.a., “tortious interference.” According to Enigma, it was unfair and retaliatory for Malwarebytes to treat its software as a threat to users and remove it from computers when performing scans. Fortunately, Bleeping Computer was propped up by Malwarebytes’ developers, who tossed $5,000 into Bleeping Computer’s legal defense fund. Somehow, this dubious lawsuit managed to survive a motion to dismiss.
![spyhunter malware remover vs malwarebytes spyhunter malware remover vs malwarebytes](https://i0.wp.com/patchlinks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/33333-2.png)
It sued a review site for having the audacity to suggest its pay-to-clean anti-spyware software wasn’t a good fit for most users… or really any users at all.īleeping Computer found itself served with a defamation lawsuit for making fact-based claims (with links to supporting evidence) about Enigma’s dubious product, dubious customer service tactics (like the always-popular “auto-renew”), and dubious lawsuits. But the company isn’t known so much for containing threats as it’s known for issuing threats. Enigma Software makes Spyhunter, a malware-fighting program with a very questionable reputation.